LO4/5 Revised Treatment with Information of the Groups Contributions (I.e. me)

Original Treatment

Revised Treatment (Improved/Developed)

As you can see below the improvements made to the newer treatment are varied. The most notable of which is the way in which the treatment is now presented i.e. the form is presented a lot more cleanly which makes it easier to read and understand, for example the headings and subheadings are clear and easily visible. The second most notable change is that of the amount of writing/content within the form i.e. the form is presented in a more professional manner, for example it uses full sentences rather than one word answers. Another notable change to the treatment is that is goes into a lot more depth when required, for example in the section about the hosts and presenters we have clearly stated why we think that Stephen and me (Joseph) would be good hosts and why we believe that. The fourth and last most notable change to the treatment was the addition of the future development ideas, i.e. where I talked about the possible increase in time in which the audio media product stayed up for.

However there are several other alterations to the treatment that are less noticeable such as the way in which the production method of the audio media product is presented and the way in which the question ‘Will your program use advertising to make a profit’ is presented/answered. Another way in which the treatment was altered was the target audience for example I went into more depth about who our audience will be, much like I stated in the previous paragraph. Much like the same as before another alteration was that of the addition of possible questions to be raised for interviews and the typical music that is to be heard in this podcast. Another alteration that was made to the radio treatment ‘Anime Half-Hour’ was within the financial section of the treatment as we went back and looked at the cost of everything and checked the maths and found mistakes with the pricing of the PRS licence so we went back to alter the mistake and change the annual income of the audio media product.